East Hampshire District Council
Tree
There is a problem
- 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order
0444
- reference
- 191-tree-1
- name
- 0444
- tree-preservation-order
- 191-tpo-1
- uprn
- address-text
- point
- POINT (-0.940749 50.862070)
- geometry
- MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.940693 50.862064,-0.940695 50.862075,-0.940703 50.862085,-0.940715 50.862093,-0.940731 50.862098,-0.940749 50.862100,-0.940766 50.862099,-0.940782 50.862094,-0.940795 50.862086,-0.940803 50.862076,-0.940806 50.862065,-0.940804 50.862054,-0.940796 50.862044,-0.940783 50.862036,-0.940768 50.862030,-0.940750 50.862028,-0.940733 50.862030,-0.940717 50.862035,-0.940704 50.862043,-0.940696 50.862053,-0.940693 50.862064)))
- notes
- felled-date
- entry-date
- 2026-08-06
- start-date
- end-date
How to fix this issue
Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.
The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:
tree-preservation-order
The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.
Example: TPO1
How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data
- Fix the errors indicated
- Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
- Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL